?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Previous Entry Share Next Entry
and i thought persia just used the veil fo' the ugly bitches...
akmed
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003289.html

in which the ' secular' islamic state of turkey prosecutes a 92 year old archeologist for stating that the islamic head bag forced on women is derived from ancient goddess worshipping priestesses who wore veils to initiate young people into sex.

she was acquitted today but ,still , where the fuck are the so called feminists on issues of the insane and violent hatred of women inherent in not so even radical islam?( turkey is one of the only so called ' democracies' among the majority moslem countries). they were all over some western woman, living in a secular democracy, willingly showing her snatch in a magazine but woman are basically imprisoned, can't drive cars nor vote, are stoned to death in soccer stadiums for the crime of adultery and you don't hear a peep in the regard to such blindingly obvious misogyny- a genocide spiritually if not in reality upon human females, indeed on the very idea of the female.

women are the jews to islam's third reich - followed by you and i in the ' west'- if you happen to be any other religion save islam or if you dare criticize any moslem at any time for any reason or draw a cartoon of mohammed .

and so many don't think it can happen here- in western europe or america . the stalwarts of the western media, champions of free speech and 'progress', refused to openly come to the aid of or even offer the vaguest support to the country of denmark when a paper there dared to print such a cartoon. some papers in america , after those worshippers of the religion of peace burned danish embassies to the ground, demanded the death of the cartoonists and rioted,refused to reprint the cartoons. you, oh western infidel crusader, therefore have effectively been blackmailed by moslems to give up the supposed sacred right to freedom of expression and nary a yip from writers, artists, politicians or newspaper editors of the fact.

it should be noted that denmark, unlike france and norway, refused to surrender political power to nazi germany. they saved their own jews by sneaking them into sweden and worked tirelessly to save others and subvert the germans , who considered them fellow aryans occupying land that was by all rights german. the danish are saints as far as i'm concerned ,unlike my country of origin, the other white flag, la belle france, who was shitting on it's french jews long before old cousin adolph came along ( right before WW1 the Frogocracy was considering shipping all jews to french colonial possession madagascar. this is the same country who chucked it's medal bearing, legless, armless jewish veterans who had given their flesh and blood to france right up the smokestacks of the concentration camps in the east. meurte la france!).

what the impartial media has also been, well, i guess, forgetting to report is that there has been something of an epidemic of moslem immigrants raping and gang raping western female children and women for not wearing the veil and for not being ' modest'. the most recent relatively well publicized cases are from australia, although largely reported not because they had just occurred- the cases referenced happened in the late 90's/ early 2000- but because some mufti douche bag was just mouthing off about the sentences given to the poor moslem sacks of shit for purposely gang raping western european australian women as young as 13 just because they were 1) ' aussie pigs'( direct quote from one of the defendants) and 2) didn't leave the house dressed in a veil and an ankle length garbage bag.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20647564-661,00.html

however, the scandinavian countries in particular have been overwhelmed by similar crimes that the official news sources and authorities refuse to name for what they are- racially / religiously motivated rapes perpetrated on native( read: WHITE) women by immigrant men from moslem countries. if it was Thor raping moslem women because they are moslem you'd sure as hell hear about it. it's fucking outrageous.

http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/02/muslim-rape-epidemic-in-sweden-and.html

this is what we have come to- accommodating people who want to destroy us as secular, freedom loving humans in our to each his own world where women aren't viewed as property ,' bags of meat',or the ' tools of satan' luring men to rape and thus sin. these people cannot be accommodated. to do so would be suicide.

at this point in history can anyone say it was ok to accommodate hitler?( we'll , many moslems think that because most think the holocaust never happened and iranians view themselves as aryan-snort!. iran, in farsi, means 'land of the aryans'.) woman hating, free speech denying for anyone but themselves, radical islamists are not compatible with freedom, democracy and the vigilant care of the human rights of ALL humans. if one group of people's expression of their freedom of religion demands the negation of all other religions, the subjugation of all women and the execution of anyone for the content of their speech alone, then they must be called out for what they are, removed , if necessary(especially if they are infringing on the rights and liberties of others or are plotting to do so), or , frankly, destroyed.


  • 1
this is an add on to my comments-
it is not the US/bush that has dragged it's heels on Dafur in the UN. the usa declared what was going on there a genocide in 2004. bush just signed legislation demanding action and adequet funding there and it is because of several countries abstaining in the security council from voting on darfur that nothing adequet gets done-those countries being algeria, china, pakistan and russia. the human rights commision peopled with such champions of freedom and human dignity as syria refuses to use any leverage to boulster the puny peace keeping forces sent or leverage more support to end what's happening.our congress has been voting resolutions refering to darfur for years but the UN cannot be compelled to comply with them.

it has been illegal for sometime for us citizens to do business with the sudan and bush further signed an executive order reenforcing this. im not sure what else he's suppose to do short of donning body armour himself.how can these measures be construed as bush not doing anything? because these measures and resolutions are never prominantly featured in the news and the voting records of other UN members are hardly ever discussed. it is the fault of the usual suspects in the UN-ie fundamentalist islamic states and china and russia who always seem to vote with these assholes or at least refuse to vote against them. ethnic arabs are killing black people becasue they are black and that's the ugly truth no one wants to say.
http://darfurscores.org/darfur-legislation

  • 1